RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Head-to-head comparative data for the postoperative care of patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate complication and readmission rates between patients undergoing same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) discharges for ablative procedures in the left atrium, primarily atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Two electrophysiology centers simultaneously perform left atrial ablations with differing discharge strategies. We identified all patients who underwent left atrial ablation from August 2017 to August 2019 (n = 409) undergoing either SD (n = 210) or ND (n = 199) discharge protocols. We analyzed any clinical events that resulted in procedural abortion, extended hospitalization, or readmission within 72 hours. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of complication and readmission rate was similar between SD and ND discharge (14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665). Rates of complications categorized as major (2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0. 776) and minor (11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524) were also similar.Multivariable regression modeling revealed no significant correlation between discharge strategy and complication/readmission occurrence (OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23), but a positive association of hypertension and procedure duration (OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006) and (OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial ablation complication and readmission rates were similar between SD and ND discharge practices. Hypertension and procedural duration were associated with increased complication rates irrespective of discharge strategy. These data, which represent the first side-by-side comparison of discharge strategy, suggests same-day discharge is safe and feasible for left atrial ablation procedures.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Right free wall (RFW) accessory pathways (AP) typically present anatomical challenges to ablation leading to high rates of procedural failure and recovery of AP conduction. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW) and a manifest RFW AP undergoing an electrophysiology study (EPS) or an ablation at our center between 01/01/2008 and 08/01/2019 were identified from our databases using diagnosis codes and manual chart review. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with manifest RFW AP underwent EPS, all of which were targeted for ablation. Single procedure success rate was 19 / 21 (90.5%). Of the 19 successful cases, 4 (17.4%) patients were found to have recurrent right free wall pathway conduction at follow-up and each underwent a successful 2nd procedure (9.5%). Fluoroscopic and 3D electroanatomic mapping software was used in all cases to guide ablation. A 4 mm or 8 mm non-irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter was used in 76% of cases while an 8 mm cryo-catheter was used in one case. More than one type of ablation catheter was used in four cases (16%). A steerable sheath was used in 68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary center, RFW AP ablation has high acute success (>90%) but approximately 21% of patients with initially successful ablation required a 2nd procedure for recurrence of pathway conduction. A combination of a large tip ablation catheter and a steerable sheath were used in most cases.
